Your joke is bad, and you should feel bad.
by spastictactician
“Oh, hey! A squirrel!”
Have a conversation that even tangentially involves Attention Deficit Disorder, and someone is almost certain to make a joke based on an apparent sufferer who interrupts himself with a silly, unrelated observation, consequently losing complete track of their original thought.
Please know that ADD isn’t that. It is NOT the inability to maintain a train of thought, the inability to finish a task due to failure to stay on track or complete lack of focus. No matter how many times you’ve heard the joke, it just isn’t true.
Let me assure you that I’m not about to tell you how people with ADD are being subjected to great harm due to this misunderstanding. I’m not going to demand that you stop making the joke. I don’t believe that it is particularly important that everybody gain a proper understanding of what ADD is, nor do I believe we need to start any sort of movement to improve awareness.
I only want to let you know that, when you say things like this, those of us with ADD tend to shake our heads sadly at you and wonder silently how you continue to choose to comment on something that you so clearly don’t understand. It doesn’t take away from the marginal humour that you’ve managed. If that’s what ADD was, the joke would be prescient. If your aim is to cause brief, twitchy smiles amongst people who don’t really know what you’re talking about… be my guest. Nobody is really the worse for it.
“Well, then, Mr. Patronizing Jerk,” I imagine you asking, “What in the hell is it, if it isn’t the whole “Oh, hey! A squirrel!” thing?” Fair warning: The real thing doesn’t lend itself quite so easily to quick, lazy jokes. For me, ADD involves a heavy, near constant internal monologue. I talk to myself, coach, warn, coerce, motivate, keep track of and regulate myself. The problem is that the internal voice doesn’t limit itself to observing the important things and keeping me up to date on them. It has access to everything my senses can pick up, and it is unable to effectively filter what I need to know.
Here’s where the reality really differs from the joke: When the internal moderator gets ahold of a new piece of information…Say, a squirrel that has just popped up in my peripheral vision, it doesn’t shut down whatever I was just doing to refocus on the squirrel. My entire consciousness doesn’t just switch to the squirrel, leaving my previous tasks untended. That is how babies, dogs and people on cocaine work, not people with ADD
When I’m hunkered down at my desk trying to create a lesson plan, I start out incredibly focused. When that squirrel pops up, I certainly notice it, and my internal moderator announces it loudly. I am, however, not a slave to the moderator. I know what I’m here to do and I know that paying too much attention to the squirrel will prevent that. I apply myself to my task. The problem is, now that I know the squirrel is there, the part of my brain that doesn’t work well believes that I need to keep track of it. I keep getting updates about the squirrel. Where it is, what it is doing… The only thing I can do to make sure I can finish my task is to not fight the squirrel updates but, instead, to dedicate a part of my consciousness (as small a part as possible) to the squirrel. Partitioning focus is WAY easier than fighting to maintain a single track.
Now that I’ve split my attention two ways, and ensured that the split is as heavily weighted toward my task as possible, I can get on with the work. Here comes the part that makes most ADD kids bad at school: There are more than two things within range of my senses. There is the task at hand, the squirrel, the ticking of the clock, the flickering of the fluorescent light, the question I had about the TV show I watched last night, the itchy spot behind my knee, the .faint beginnings of a food craving, the lingering smell of the fart I let squeak 5 minutes ago, the recognition that there is a word I’m going to want to use soon that I never remember how to spell, the thing I can feel behind my front teeth that might be a grain of pepper…
Partitioning is really quite easy when there are only two partitions. Once you have a dozen or so, however, the resources applied to non-primary functions begin adding up. When the internal dialogue begins cycling through so many different topics that, even at just a second or so each, you can only focus on your task once or twice a minute, you’re pretty much doomed to failure.
The way I’ve learned to cope with this recurring problem is by physically resetting myself, using strongly distracting breaks. By interrupting the internal cycle, I get to start fresh with just two or three partitions. Also, I tend to intentionally subject myself to big, full distractions while working. As counterintuitive as this sounds, there actually is some logic here. If I can fill the entirety of my aural spectrum with “Gangsta’s Paradise”, I’m almost sure to not hear any of the other 37 tiny little noises in the room. I have essentially ensured only one partition from this particular sense. I do the same for internal distractions by setting my mind to thinking about something interesting but unrelated to my task. Often, naked ladies. The mental image of the Samantha Fox poster from my friend Scott’s room cancels all the other trivial stuff that would otherwise horn in. I now only have to control the amount of attention I pay to it. Not giving Samantha enough attention leaves me open to other little distractions. Too much attention, though, and I drift into a daydream that is almost certainly not going to help me get my lesson planned.
So. The thing that sucks about ADD isn’t an inability to focus and maintain processes, it’s that sufferers focus on too many things and maintain loads of partitioned focus points. It is too much focus, not too little. We aren’t goldfish, wandering from thought to thought, never finishing anything as we get sidetracked by every damn squirrel that wanders by. We are much more like a…. Why doesn’t he just pick up the damned acorn, already?

I find that whenever someone describes to me a certain disorder, I can find ways that it applies to me. I have experienced situations where my attention is split the way you describe. So often in fact that I have formed my own copping mechanisms for them. I actually never studied when I was in school because I had not yet developed any of these methods to the point where I could keep my focus on studying long enough to finish reading a page of text. I’m still not sure if I could.
Another example is OCD. I don’t have symptoms that are as strong as many people I know, but I do have rituals that I either need to do, or they will bug me until I can sufficiently distract myself from thinking about them. I could list more, but the point I am trying to get to is that I wonder how many other people can say the same. Are these disorders actually things that we all experience to some extent, and if so, how do we distinguish between those who have a disorder and those who don’t? Where is the dividing line?
I know that it’s not something that can be easily answered, but it is something I think is interesting to consider.
The difference is the frequency and severity of the occurences. In the same way that having the runs every couple of months does not mean you have IBS, finding that you have difficulty maintaining one point focus in certain situations does not mean you have ADD. The problem is that, for quite a while, doctors stopped seeing the distinction. This is why there is such a problem with overdiagnosis and with over prescription of pharmaceuticals.
I also have OCD. The need to complete rituals is the easiest part to deal with. Everybody has that to a degree or other. Most with OCD have it severely but, still, if that was it, there wouldn’t be much to complain about. The big issue is the constant, whirling thoughts of uncertain provedence that assault the consciousness pretty much all the time. At their best, they lead to weird rituals. At their worst, they lead to physical activities that are dangerous, counter-productive, insane or just plain contrary to actual desire.
And if I hear another co-worker complain about how OCD they are because they like to keep all their paper clips in one place, I may just wear their skulls as hats. Being anal or liking things to be a certain way is not even close to the shittiness that is OCD.
The simple test is, does it really mess up your life? If not, you do not have a diagnosable mental illness, you have a personality.
I like the work Tom Hartman has done on this topic, noting how males with ADD notice the gazelle in front of them… and the birds taking wing, and the grass moving wrong, and they back away form the gazelle because the TIGER that the non-ADD hunter would have not noticed is about to jump either you, or the gazelle!
Heck of a good survival trait in War, Hunting, Agriculture, and a host of other skills that we don’t use in every day life for the last 75 years or so.
So it must now be a “Problem.” To heck with the last few… er… 18 millennia.
And yet…. I think it is still useful.
Oh, and thanks for the heads-up on focus. I do the same thing, but now I know it works (-ish) for somebody else!
I haven’t read Hartman, but, from your description, he’s missing the part where this is a serious illness that *prevents* proper functioning. Noticing different things would be OK if a sufferer could process them effectively or if several of those things weren’t internal and unrelated to what is actually happening. The difference between “useful neurological function” and “neurological illness” is the difference between “Hey, that’s coo.l” and “Please, please stop, so I can function just a little.”